Helping The others Realize The Advantages Of h4831 vs h4831sc

Given that there would not appear to be any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can many of you offer a place to begin with this mix and things to think about when Operating this Load up?

H4831SC Powder obtainable in inventory now. Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimensions, thus, the designation SC or quick cut. The shorter, far more compact kernels allow the powder to circulation throughout the powder steps far more effortlessly, helping to reduce the continuous reducing of granules.

The obvious trigger is a rough/ruff bore. No number of copper fouling decreasing brokers from the powder will right this.

Warning using SC or SSC designed loads with prolonged cut, back again off and perform up. Use Harmless loading methods.

Yup or it would not function perfectly. And For the reason that OP incorporates a load applying Varget I'd attempt to seek out anyone to trade with. Might come up with a get gain scenario.

I do know, rough moments. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just didn't like the case density when loaded long. I do not try to remember powder charge off the top of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps that's the place I normally goal to become. In your circumstance making use of h4831sc load data what you have (and what I ought to have accomplished) I'd start with the top on the bearing surface of the bullet ideal with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there after you find a velocity node.

I don't love to operate up a load making use of a person great deal of powder after which you can have to work up all over again since I operate out and possess to start utilizing a new ton number.

excaliber said: I have identified the precise reverse for being true in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g h4831 vs h4831sc Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly correct powder in my three hundred Acquire Mag.

Currently working with IMR 4831 within a 300WSM, and find out the H4831sc is a popular option h4831sc for this caliber and yields a little more velocity. Besides it becoming brief Slash, what exactly is the primary difference in these two powders, and will I switch to H4831sc?

Liberalism; The impossible but approved Idea that it's solely attainable to choose up a turd via the clean finish.

Despite the similarity in nomenclature, they're completely different powders, with IMR 4831 staying significantly quicker in comparison to the Hodgdon variants. Will not address them as the identical powder, since they most surely aren't.

It is really likely that no additional discussion is required, during which scenario we propose setting up a new thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is required you are able to nevertheless achieve this.

The two provide the Same burn charge, small Slash comes in handy In case you are at max fill rather than at force/velocity that you might want you can get much more shortcut within a circumstance.

I found that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min prices. I’m speaking 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had been a small 60s grain cost inside of a Norma situation. Not what I had been seeking, but exact Nevertheless.